The effect and impression of the element of zaman in the comparison of two theories of authenticity and non-authenticity of khabar vahed in the jurisprudence process of the Imami school of jurisprudence
Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Ramhormoz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ramhormoz, Iran.
Abstract
One of the most important foundations and documents of Islamic sciences and knowledge after the Holy Quran is Akhbar and Revayat. Akhbar is divided into mutawatir and ahad based on the authority of the chain of transmission. There is no disagreement about the authenticity of mutawatir Akhbar, but there have been long-standing differences regarding the authenticity of Khabar vahed. In this regard, what has surprised scholars and researchers are the two opposing theories of Sayyid Murtaza Alam al-Huda and Sheikh Tusi, both of whom have considered consensus as the basis for their theory. Therefore, Islamic scholars and researchers have sought to justify and collect those theories, while appreciating the valuable efforts of the great men who have attempted to collect and justify them. This article, which is based on its subject, is in-depth and by designing a case study using an analytical and descriptive method, has proposed and examined another hypothesis that what has caused this disagreement is the requirements of the times and the need of the school for jurisprudence research based on this category. While respecting the great men and women of jurisprudence, it has explained the hypothesis in question and has reached these results. It has been found that historical causes and factors and the requirements of the time have caused the emergence of these theories. Because theories, especially in the field of humanities and social sciences, do not emerge in a vacuum, but are formed in an appropriate context and in a specific context and time. Therefore, considering the jurisprudential foundations of these two stars in the sky of jurisprudence, the new solution is that the element of time and the requirements of the era, considering the lofty goals of Islamic jurisprudence and law, have caused this difference.
Asadi koohbad, H. (2025). The effect and impression of the element of zaman in the comparison of two theories of authenticity and non-authenticity of khabar vahed in the jurisprudence process of the Imami school of jurisprudence. , 6(21), 51-65.
MLA
Hormoz Asadi koohbad. "The effect and impression of the element of zaman in the comparison of two theories of authenticity and non-authenticity of khabar vahed in the jurisprudence process of the Imami school of jurisprudence". , 6, 21, 2025, 51-65.
HARVARD
Asadi koohbad, H. (2025). 'The effect and impression of the element of zaman in the comparison of two theories of authenticity and non-authenticity of khabar vahed in the jurisprudence process of the Imami school of jurisprudence', , 6(21), pp. 51-65.
VANCOUVER
Asadi koohbad, H. The effect and impression of the element of zaman in the comparison of two theories of authenticity and non-authenticity of khabar vahed in the jurisprudence process of the Imami school of jurisprudence. , 2025; 6(21): 51-65.